AI Research OXYOXY_fundamentalsmacro:brent_daily

OXY: net debt/EBITDA vs subsequent beta to Brent (N=10 quarters)

10
Quarters analyzed

Over the past ten quarters, OXY’s balance sheet and its oil sensitivity have moved in the direction theory predicts: when net debt-to-EBITDA was higher, the stock’s subsequent beta to Brent was also higher, averaging 0.50 versus 0.38 in the low-leverage quarters. But the relationship is nowhere near conclusive. The correlation is weak and statistically indistinguishable from zero, which is exactly the kind of result worth reading closely before anyone decides what it means.

This is a small-sample study, so the nuance matters more than the headline direction. We computed each quarter’s leverage, measured OXY’s beta to Brent over the following 63 trading days, and tested whether a weaker balance sheet made the stock a more levered crude bet. The numbers point mildly that way, yet the evidence is too thin to support the thesis. The full breakdown, charts, and the necessary caveats follow.

The research question

For OXY over the past ~3 years, does its daily return’s beta to Brent crude increase in the quarter after its net debt-to-EBITDA ratio rises? Higher leverage amplifies oil-price exposure, so beta climbs when the balance sheet weakens, making OXY an even more levered bet on crude.

How this was measured

Quarterly net debt/EBITDA = (long_term_debt - cash_and_equivalents)/EBITDA. β = OLS slope of OXY daily returns on Brent daily returns over the next 63 trading days (≈ one calendar quarter), anchored on the first trading day ≥ fiscal quarter end. Only windows with ≥30 observations were used. Pearson/Spearman correlation and a Welch t-test on the high/low leverage median split test the hypothesis that higher leverage amplifies oil beta.

The key numbers

Quarters analyzed
10
Pearson r (leverage vs β)
0.281
|r|=0.281 ≤ 0.3 → weak
Pearson p-value
0.4317
p=0.4317 ≥ 0.05 → not significant
Spearman r (rank)
0.115
Mean β (high leverage > 5.70)
0.503
N=5 quarters
Mean β (low leverage)
0.376
N=5 quarters
β diff (high − low)
0.127
Positive = higher leverage amplifies β
Welch t-statistic
0.942
Positive favors high-leverage group
Welch p-value (two-sided)
0.3814
p=0.3814 ≥ 0.05 → no clear difference

Reading the numbers

Over 10 quarters, OXY's average beta to Brent was 0.44, but the link between leverage and next-quarter beta was weak (r=0.28, p=0.43) and not statistically significant. High-leverage quarters averaged 0.50 beta vs 0.38, a gap that could easily be chance.

The charts

OXY: leverage vs subsequent beta to Brent
What this chart says

The scatter shows a loose cloud of points rather than a clear upward slope: quarters with higher net debt-to-EBITDA do not consistently produce higher betas to Brent. The correlation is only 0.28, and the p-value of 0.43 means a relationship this weak would often appear by chance in 10 quarters. The highest leverage point on the right is not matched by a standout beta, so the raw picture does not support the idea that a weaker balance sheet reliably amplifies oil exposure.

Mean subsequent beta by leverage group
What this chart says

The high-leverage bar is taller at 0.50 versus 0.38 for low-leverage quarters, a difference of about 0.13 in beta. But the Welch test p-value of 0.38 says this gap is not statistically meaningful, so the bars should be read as roughly similar rather than proof of a leverage effect. With only five quarters in each group, the visual difference carries little confidence.

Quarter-level leverage and subsequent beta

fiscal_date_endingnet_debt/ebitdasubsequent_betan_trading_days
2023-09-304.63690.368863
2023-12-314.68090.213663
2024-03-315.58590.283263
2024-06-304.35690.418363
2024-09-306.01410.445563
2024-12-3110.39250.684563
2025-03-315.8220.86263
2025-06-306.91020.271563
2025-09-305.1630.594863
2025-12-317.3210.252463

The takeaway

Across 10 quarterly observations, OXY's net debt/EBITDA and subsequent-quarter beta to Brent showed Pearson r = +0.281 (p = 0.432) and Spearman r = +0.115 (p = 0.751). Splitting at the median leverage (5.70), the high-leverage group had mean beta 0.50 (n = 5) vs 0.38 (n = 5) for the low-leverage group, a difference of +0.13. Welch t = +0.94, p = 0.381. The evidence is too weak to draw a firm conclusion.

The fine print