AI Research TTETTE_earningsmacro:brent_daily

TTE Brent-beta decoupling after EPS misses: 10d/20d vs trailing 120d

7
Usable miss events

TotalEnergies has long traded like a leveraged proxy for Brent crude: when oil moves, the stock tends to follow, with a trailing 120-day beta around 0.30. But an earnings miss is a different kind of shock, and the data suggest it changes that relationship.

We tested seven usable quarterly EPS misses. In the 10 days after a miss, TTE's average beta to Brent dropped to 0.16; over the next 20 days it fell to 0.10 — roughly a third of its pre-miss level. The 20-day decoupling is statistically solid (p≈0.02), with six of seven events showing a lower beta. The 10-day shift is weaker, a lean rather than a definitive break.

The full breakdown and methodology follow. The pattern fits a straightforward thesis: a miss forces investors to reprice company-specific execution risk, at least temporarily, before the crude-link trade takes back over.

The research question

After TTE reports a quarterly EPS miss, does its 10-day daily-return beta to Brent crude fall below its trailing 120-day beta, and does that decoupling persist over the next 20 trading days? I expect a large miss to break the stock's crude-link trade because investors reprice it on company-specific execution risk rather than oil beta.

How this was measured

TTE minute bars were resampled to daily closes and joined with the global Brent crude daily series on common trading days. Daily returns were computed for both series, and beta was estimated as the OLS slope of TTE daily returns on Brent daily returns. For each quarterly EPS miss (surprise_percentage < 0), the first TTE return date on or after the report was anchored as t0. The trailing 120-day beta used the 120 daily returns ending before t0; post-miss betas used returns t0+1 through t0+10 and t0+1 through t0+20, excluding the earnings-day return itself to avoid the idiosyncratic earnings shock. Paired t-tests compare post-miss betas to the trailing beta across usable events.

The key numbers

Usable miss events
7
EPS surprise_percentage < 0 with >=120 trailing and >=20 post days
Raw EPS misses in earnings history
40
Before requiring surrounding daily data
Mean trailing 120d beta
0.305
OLS daily TTE return on Brent return
Mean 10d post-miss beta
0.164
Days t+1 through t+10 after first return on/after report
Mean 20d post-miss beta
0.103
Days t+1 through t+20 after first return on/after report
Mean 10d beta minus trailing beta
-0.140
Negative means oil beta fell after miss
Mean 20d beta minus trailing beta
-0.202
Negative means decoupling persisted at 20d horizon
Fraction of events with lower 10d beta
71.43%
Share of individual misses where 10d beta < trailing 120d beta
Fraction of events with lower 20d beta
85.71%
Share of individual misses where 20d beta < trailing 120d beta
Paired t-stat: 10d vs trailing
-1.471
Positive means 10d beta > trailing beta
Paired p-value: 10d vs trailing
0.1917
Two-sided; p=0.1917 ≥ 0.05 → no statistically clear shift
Paired t-stat: 20d vs trailing
-3.073
Positive means 20d beta > trailing beta
Paired p-value: 20d vs trailing
0.0218
Two-sided; p=0.0218 < 0.05 → statistically clear difference at 20d

Reading the numbers

Across 7 usable TTE earnings misses, Brent beta averaged 0.30 before, 0.16 in the 10 days after, and 0.10 over the next 20 days. That supports a weaker crude link on average, but p=0.1917 means the 10-day drop is not statistically clear.

The charts

TTE Brent-beta by window across EPS miss events
What this chart says

The trailing 120-day window averages a beta of 0.305, with values from 0.175 to 0.486, while the post-miss 10-day window averages 0.164 but ranges from -0.144 to 0.598. The average drops after the miss, but the wide spread shows that one event had a much higher beta, which is why only 71% of individual misses produced a lower 10-day beta. That pattern is consistent with a broken crude-link trade on average, but it is not a clean shift across all events.

Mean TTE Brent-beta by window
What this chart says

The bars show the same story at a glance: mean beta steps down from about 0.30 before the miss to 0.16 in the 10 days after, then to 0.10 in the 20 days after. The 10-day decline of about 0.14 and the 20-day decline of about 0.20 both point in the direction of decoupling. The caveat is that with only 7 events, the 10-day change is not statistically clear at the 5% level. The 20-day horizon looks more consistent on average, with 86% of individual events showing a lower beta than before the miss.

TTE EPS miss events: Brent beta windows

report_datesurprise_pctpre_120d_betapost10_betapost20_betadelta10delta20
2024-02-07-7.690.2940.5980.0710.305-0.223
2024-07-25-4.810.2370.1310.132-0.106-0.104
2024-10-31-2.790.2690.3450.3860.0750.117
2025-04-30-0.540.4850.2160.24-0.269-0.245
2025-07-24-13.330.369-0.048-0.047-0.417-0.417
2025-10-30-0.560.175-0.144-0.017-0.318-0.192
2026-02-11-2.260.3050.052-0.044-0.253-0.349

The takeaway

On average, yes: TTE's crude link does weaken after an EPS miss, and the decoupling gets more convincing as the window lengthens. Mean beta to Brent drops from roughly 0.30 over the trailing 120 days to 0.16 in the first 10 days after a miss and 0.10 over the next 20 days — by the 20-day mark, beta is about a third of its pre-miss level. That 20-day drop is statistically clear (p = 0.02, roughly a 2-in-100 chance of being luck), and 6 of the 7 usable misses produced a lower 20-day beta. The 10-day shift is weaker evidence: p = 0.19, with only 5 of 7 events showing a lower beta, so at that horizon it's a lean rather than a definitive break. The practical read is that a miss does tend to reprice TTE on company-specific execution risk rather than oil, and that repricing is more visible after a few weeks, but with only seven events the exact magnitude is fragile and near-zero misses are lumped in with large ones.

The fine print